Thursday, 14 November 2013

God-centred Prayer



There are at least two ways “worship” may be defined. Firstly, worship should be a way of life. This is reflected in two of the Hebrew and Greek etymologies, ebed or avad (Exo 3:12; Ps 100:2; Deut 10:12–13) and latreuo (Acts 24:14; Rom 12:1), both meaning “to serve” or “service.” Thus, just as scheduled breathing is spurious, our “spiritual act of worship” (latrein; Rom 12:1) is not an act done in interval with other acts of non–worship, but is the conscious and uninterrupted offering up of our bodies to God. It is a life of integrity and consistency, and hence it has moral–ethical connotations (Rom 6:13). Worship is not an abrupt supernatural event in a life characterized generally by an “ever-increasing wickedness” (Rom 6:20), as if worship is a miraculous interposition of something sacred amid our ungodly routine. Rather, it is a way of life, so that it is actually the acts of wickedness that are the unwelcomed intrusions to a life of service to God. Unfortunately, the ought is not always reflected in current state of affairs, or the is. For many Christians, worship is something we do once or twice a week when we gather for about an hour or two at “Church.”

To understand worship as a scheduled event or act done by a gathered community is not altogether negative. Even the Israelites in the old covenant congregated at the Temple to offer their sacrifices. The Diaspora Jews gathered in the synagogue to listen to and reflect on the Word. The early Christians met together on special and designated days for worship in their homes. Like us today, they gathered to sing songs, listen to the Word, and then adjourned to return to their respective employment and tasks as civil servants, merchants, slaves, mother, father, children, and so on. In fact, this is the second way we may understand what worship is: worship as a special event. This will be the main focus of this presentation, although it is by no means argued that the first definition is less important.

Why will this presentation focus more on worship as an special event than worship as a lifestyle? It is because there are more confusions that need to be addressed in defining worship as an special event than in understanding it as a lifestyle. It will not be surprising that responses will be variegated should the members of a single congregation are asked what the purpose of worship is. The pastor or worship organizer may have a different mission or agenda in the worship service than what the members are looking forward to in coming to worship. There are song leaders whose definitions of what true worship means do not match those of the worshippers. Worshippers have different expectations. We all have our different understandings of what worship is, what the purpose of worship is, how worship should be done, why we worship, and so on.

The greatest problem of contemporary worship, however, is the loss of God as the heart of worship. This is the root of all confusions in worship. It is because we have dethroned God and enthroned ourselves in worship that terms such as “dissatisfaction” has become a possibility in worship. It is because of the elevation of the self and what it gains in worship that questions like “Are you blessed?” have become important. Rabid pragmatism and utilitarianism that emphasize meeting human desires, needs and wants have become the categories in which worship is planned and carried out. Worship services have been turned into an entertainment cafĂ© where the value of the event is located in the satisfaction of customers through great music, good food, and the talk from the stand–up comedian. Customer satisfaction replaced God–centricism in worship. With Marva J. Dawn, “We must recognize this for the idolatry it is.”[1] As C. Weldon Gaddy also wrote, “To use Christian worship for any purpose other than the glorification of God is to abuse it.”[2]

The purpose of this presentation, therefore, is to put God back in his proper place in our worship services: at the center. We are going to accomplish this, by (1) defining what worship is, and (2) providing examples from both the biblical traditions and the early church on how God is placed at the center of worship. By doing (2), we hope to discover both the richness of their traditions and learn some principles we can apply today.


I. WHAT IS WORSHIP?
The word “worship” comes from two Anglo–Saxon words: weorth, meaning “honor” and “worthiness” and scipe, meaning “to create.” From weorthscipe, it became worthship, and finally to the form we know today as “worship.” It basically means “to attribute worth” or “to create honor.”[3] This is precisely what the Psalmists beckoned us to do:

“Ascribe to the Lord the glory due his name;
    bring an offering, and come into his courts.
Worship the Lord in holy splendor;
    tremble before him, all the earth” (Ps 96:8–9)

Because “Great is the Lord, and greatly to be praised” (Ps 96:4), we must “extol the Lord our God” (Ps 99:9). The other biblical terms to express worship reveal this basic orientation of glorifying God. The  Hebrew shachah (Gen 24:26–27, 52; 27:29; Ps 66:4; 1 Sam 25:23; 2 Sam 14:33; 24:20; 2 Chron 7:3; 19:29) and its Greek equivalent proskuneo (Matt 2:11; John 4:21–24) literally mean “to bow down” or “to prostrate oneself.” If in the Psalm worship is done through words, proskuneo is a worship done through action. It is the gesture of bowing down to a ruler or master. An instance of shachah, followed by words of praise is in Genesis 24:26–27, when Isaac “bowed his head and worshiped the Lord and said, ‘Blessed be the Lord’.” Indeed, “all creation worships (shachah) [God]” (Ps 66:4). Related to shachah and proskuneo are the Hebrew yare and its Greek equivalent phobeomai, which stress the awe and respect with which God’s people must approach him. This is where the idea of “the fear of the Lord” is strongly emphasized. The early church, for instance, was characterized by Luke as “living in the fear of the Lord” (Acts 9:31). The relationship between fear and worship is most typified in Revelations 14:7: “Fear God and give him glory… and worship him who made heaven and earth, the sea and the springs of water.” To fear God is also related to avad and latreuo, or worship as lifestyle, because to fear God “is to obey his voice” (1 Sam 12:14), to walk in his ways (Deut 8:6), to keep his commandments (Ecc 12:13), and to turn away from evil (Job 1:1; Prov 3:7).[4]


II. THE CONTENT OF WORSHIP
Of course, we cannot “create” God’s honor. Honor and glory are inherently God’s. Our role as worshippers is to devise ways to honor God in a way that does justice to his worthiness. On the one hand, all our creaturely attempts to do this are inadequate, so long as we are finite, but on the other hand, we can still worship him according to our utmost capacity. The goal of the worship planner is to create a platform where we can extol God so that the congregation that gathers is able to give their best in ascribing honor to God. So the questions are: “How do we bring glory to God in what we do in worship?” “What are the essential parts of the worship service that facilitate the exaltation of God?” Owing to time constraints, we are going to limit ourselves with J three major worship components: (1) prayers, (2) music and songs, and (3) reading of and listening to the Word. (I do not have the full manuscript for (2) music and (3) Word, so only (1) prayers will be given here. The powerpoint presentation will have slides on music and Word.)


III. WORSHIP IN PRAYERS

A. Prayer as Confession
In an age where the self and what benefits the self are emphasized, prayers can become avenues of self–assertion, self–indulgence, and self–promotion. In our technological–economic–utilitarian age, prayers can become too concern–oriented. We pray because we have “concerns” that require attention or we pray because we have needs that need to be met. This is all too evident in Prayer Meetings, where most (if not all) of mentioned prayer requests are actually personal and communal concerns that we hope God can do something about. God is only a part of the Prayer Meeting as the recipient of our requests, or as the Santa Clause receiving our wish lists. So if worship is primarily the human attempt to bring honor to God, how can our self–centered and need–oriented prayers in worship services accomplish such an honoring of God?

Jewish prayers are different. One of the primary types is called berakah (plural, berakot), from barak, meaning “to bless.” Its Greek counterpart is eulogetos. It is a prayer concerned with blessing the name of God through proclaiming his qualities (Ps 89:52; Exo 18:10).[5] Exodus 34:6–8 beautifully illustrates this:

“The Lord, the Lord,
a God merciful and gracious,
slow to anger,
and abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness,
keeping steadfast love for the thousandth generation,
forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin,
yet by no means clearing the guilty,
but visiting the iniquity of the parents
upon the children
and the children’s children,
to the third and the fourth generation.”
And Moses quickly bowed his head toward the earth, and worshiped.

In the OT, there are numerous instances where shouts of exaltation just erupts, beginning with the words “Blessed be the Lord” followed by adjectives and reminiscing of God’s acts (Gen 9:26; 24:27; Exo 18:10; Ruth 3:10; 1 Sam 25:32, 39; 2 Sam 18:28; 1 Kings 1:48; 5:7; 8:15, 56; 10:9; 1 Chron 16:36; 29:20; 2 Chron 2:12; 6:4; 9:8; Ezra 7:27; Ps 28:6; 31:21; 41:13; 68:19; 72:18; 89:52; 106:48; 113:2; 115:15; 124:6; 135:21; Luke 1:68; Eph 1:3; 1 Pet 1:3). In the NT, the word Amen is usually the response the congregation utters at the close of doxologies that ascribe praise to God and to Jesus Christ (Rom 1:25; 9:5; 11:36; 16:27; 2 Tim 4:18; Heb 13:21;1 Pet 4:11; 4:11; Jude 25; see also 2 Cor 1:20f).

When we pray by proclaiming who God is, we are engaged (1) in worshipping God, i.e. bringing honor to him, and (2) in theology. It is when we use human language to express the qualities of God that prayer also becomes an act of confession. This is what we need to recover. As the Greek Orthodox theologian Alexander Schmemann wrote:

Ultimately, the liturgical problem of our time is… a problem of restoring to liturgy its theological meaning, and to theology its liturgical dimension. Theology cannot recover its central place and function within the church without being rooted again in the very experience of the Church (in thanksgiving and supplication)… Theology must rediscover as its own ‘rule of faith’ the Church’s lex orandi, and the liturgy reveal itself again as the credendi.[6]

Truly, lex orandi lex credendi, “what we pray is what we believe.” It is when prayer is an act of giving honor to God that we are engaged in reflecting about the Thou we encounter. Prayer, therefore, is theologica prima. The more abstract form of critical reflection is but a secondary act.


B. Prayer as Thanksgiving
Another Jewish prayer form is called hodayah, “to give thanks.” In the NT, it is closely connected with homologeo and eucharisteo (Ps 30:12; Isa 12:1; 1 Cor 14:16; 2 Cor 1:11; 9:12; 1 Thess 5:18). Like berakah, it is concerned with giving praise to God not only for his attributes but also because of his mighty acts. Daniel can be cited as an example:

“Blessed be the name of God from age to age,
    for wisdom and power are his.
21 He changes times and seasons,
    deposes kings and sets up kings;
he gives wisdom to the wise
    and knowledge to those who have understanding.
22 He reveals deep and hidden things;
    he knows what is in the darkness,
    and light dwells with him.
23 To you, O God of my ancestors,
    I give thanks and praise,
for you have given me wisdom and power,
    and have now revealed to me what we asked of you,
    for you have revealed to us what the king ordered” (Dan 2:2-0–23).

Hodayah is basically a prayer to make confession or affirmation of God’s goodness. For instance, David wrote:

You have turned my mourning into dancing;
    you have taken off my sackcloth
    and clothed me with joy,
12 so that my soul may praise you and not be silent.
    O Lord my God, I will give thanks to you forever (Psalm 30:11–12)

It is for this reason that anamnesis, the act of remembering, is very important in Jewish life (Deut 6:21–25; Acts 2:22–26; 1 Cor 11:24). In fact, the hodayah prayers of the OT do not only recall up to the Exodus from Egypt or the election of Abraham. Psalm 136 is a classic example of a thanksgiving prayer that combines the elements of berakah, hodayah with an anamnesis of God’s work and goodness since creation!

Give thanks to the Lord, for he is good (His love never ends)
Give thanks to Him, the God of gods (His love never ends)
Give thanks to Him, the Lord of lords (His love never ends)
Who alone does great wonders (His love never ends)
Who by understanding made the heavens (His love never ends)
Who spread out the earth on the waters (His love never ends)
Who made the great lights, the sun and the moon (His love never ends)
Who brought Israel out from Egypt (His love never ends)
Who divided the Red Sea into two (His love never ends)
Who led his people through the wilderness (His love never ends)
He remembered us in our lowly estate (His love never ends)
He rescued us from our foes (His love never ends)
Give thanks to the Lord, for he is good (His love never ends)


C. Prayer as Invoking and Beseeching
Another practice in worship today that would have been weird for early Christians is not beginning with prayer. In many churches, services begin with either a Call to Worship or with songs. The Call to Worship is actually practiced in the synagogue too, but it is different from what we do today in our churches. In the synagogue worship, the Call to Worship is led by an attendant (Luke 4:20) and is essentially a berakah: “Blessed ye the Lord, the One who is to be blessed,” and the people respond in unison: “Blessed be the Lord forever” (cf Neh 9:5).[7] Thus, because it is a berakah, it is centered on honoring God, and makes God the Subject of worship. This is unlike what some congregations are doing, i.e. replacing the berakah with a casual greeting by the pastor in a false attempt to create “community” and make worshippers feel comfortable. Others, with more well–meaning motives, but still questionable, do the Call to Worship as an exercise directed to worshippers. In this, what matters at the beginning of the service is my readiness, my awareness, my experience, and my response.

The early Church, on the other hand, started worship always with a prayer called the Epiclesis, which is basically the Invocation of the Holy Spirit into the worshipping community. What is emphasized by this prayer is that we do not know how to worship or how to pray as we ought and that it is only through the Spirit that we are able to communicate with God, with or without words (Rom 8:26). It is easy to miss what Don Saliers calls as “the paradox of prayer,” or the fact that when we pray, we exist in the tension between knowing and not knowing. In fact, for him, “too much certainty about God leads to presumptive prayer” which is “the seedbed of idolatry.”[8] The Epiclesis recognizes what Jesus said to his disciples that the Spirit, when he comes, will teach them all things (John 14:26).

The importance of the Epiclesis is that by giving prerogative to God’s work in the assembly, worshippers are not only made aware of the significance of divine help in worship but also that God is again placed at the center of worship. When we gather for worship, we honor God with words and rituals, but we must realize that such are Spirit–empowered and enabled. We do not worship or we cannot worship on our own innate capacities; rather, we can only worship in the power and presence of the Spirit, who lifts us up into communion with the Father through the Son. This idea of “empowered prayer” is not so far from the concept of mediated prayer. The former is pneumatological; the latter is more Christological. Mediated prayer refers to the fact that when we pray, we always pray “in the name of Jesus.” In the first place, no one comes to the Father except through him (John 14:6). In the second place, we only have confidence to “enter the sanctuary by the blood of Jesus, by the new and living way that he opened for us through the curtain (that is, through his flesh), and since we have a great priest over the house of God” (Heb 10:19–21). We do not come to Father and we do not pray according to our own significance or in the significance of our own names; rather, we come to the Father in prayer in the name of Jesus Christ, who is our Savior, High Priest and Mediator (Heb 4:14–16). It is by acknowledging that it is only in Christ and in the Spirit that we worship that we put the Triune God as the primary Subject of worship.


[This paper was presented at a workshop entitled “Theology of Worship” on 14 November 2013 at APNTS. With me who presented are Joy Pring and DooHyun Choi. Their presentations are included in the powerpoint presentation we showed. Should you wish to have the said powerpoint presentation, email me at deugenio@apnts.edu.ph. To get more materials, should they become available, be a follower of this blog.]



[1] Marva J. Dawn, Reaching Out without Dumbing Down: A Theology of Worship for the Turn–of–the–Century Culture (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995), 87.
[2] C. Weldon Gaddy, The Gift of Worship (Nashville: Broadman, 1992), 40.
[3] Ralph P. Martin, Worship in the Early Church (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1975), 10–12; Dawn, Reaching Out, 76–77.
[4] See Robert E. Webber, Worship Old and New, rev. ed. (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1994), 29–30.
[5] It is also concerned with the confession of sin or protestations of unworthiness and faithfulness (1 Kings 8:60). See Paul F. Bradshaw, The Search for the Origins of Christian Worship (New York: Oxford U. Press, 1992), 15–16.
[6] Alexander Schmemann, “Liturgy and Theology,” Greek Orthodox Theological Review 17 (Spring 1972), 100.
[7] Martin, Worship in the Early Church, 25.
[8] Don E. Saliers, Worship as Theology: Foretaste of Divine Glory (Nashville: Abingdon, 1994), 110–111.

Exo-centric Awakening

Ephesians 5:8–14 (see also 1 Thess 5:4–11 and Rom 13:11–14)


The Apostle Paul was a great missionary, but the churches that he established during his missionary journeys were all problematic. One such problematic church was at Ephesus. Paul spent two or three years in Ephesus (Acts 19:10; 20:31), probably the years AD 52–54, and he was successful in establishing a Christian community there, especially among the Gentiles (Acts 19:17–2-0, 26; 1 Cor 16:9). After he left, he lost contact and communication with the believers there. In fact, he had been gone for more than seven years when he wrote the letter. It was probably written towards the end of his two–year imprisonment in Rome, along with the writing of Colossians and Philemon, in AD 62 (Eph 3:1, 13; 4:1; 6:20), and he may be awaiting a judicial hearing. He called himself “an ambassador in chains” (6:20).

The epistle reveals some of Paul’s concerns for the Ephesians: (1) that they might have a better understanding of what God has done for them in Christ (1:18–23), (2) that Christ might dwell in their hearts (3:17), and (3) that they might understand the massive size of Christ’s love for them (3:18–19). Paul heard that the Ephesian Christians who knew him were discouraged by his suffering and their lack of contact with him (3:13), so he also wanted to encourage them. Furthermore, he learned that the church was in disunity, which is why he also wished that they work together as they remain faithful to the teaching of the church’s founders and its present leaders (4:1–16; 2:20). Paul emphasized the importance of the unity of the believers across ethnic (2:11–22; 3:6), socioeconomic (4:28), and social lines (5:22–29). For Paul, they also needed to work together to bear effective witness to the wider society so that its hopeless way of life (4:17–19) may be transformed by the gospel (5:11–14). In order to be light to their Gentile neighbors, they should not compromise with the harmful moral standards of their unbelieving environment or assimilate to the culture they had left behind at their conversion (4:17–19; 5:3–18). Paul’s call for an awakening in Ephesians 5:14 must be understood within Paul’s dual concern for the moral life of Christians and their missional witness to the world. Hence, two interrelated awakenings might be presented: (1) moral awakening and (2) missional awakening.


MORAL AWAKENING

Ephesus was known as a center of magical practice and of the worship of Artemis or the multi-breasted Diana. Worship of the Emperor, particularly Augustus, was also a prominent part of the life at all societal levels. This is why Paul reminds his readers about the supremacy of Christ: (a) God has given Christ victory over all authorities (1:21; 4:8), (b) God put all things under Christ’s feet (1:22), (c) God is administering the times in Christ (1:9), (d) God is summing up all things in Christ (1:10), and (e) Christ’s victory over all rule and authority is both present and eternal (1:21). Paul’s argument is precise: the supreme Lord and authority that should guide our lives is Christ himself. The claimed authorities of the legal and demonic worlds are nothing compared to Christ’s authority! Thus, it is superfluous to fashion our lives, make our decisions, and schedule our daily routine in obedience to other authorities, for all such authorities are inferior to Christ’s supremacy. Nothing puts greater pressure for obedience in our lives than the authority of Christ! If we take Christ’s authority seriously, and believe that “all authority under heaven and on earth has been given to him” (Matt 28:18), then it easier for us to say, with Peter and John to anyone “Judge for yourself whether it is right in God’s sight to obey you rather than God” (Acts 4:19) and “We must obey God rather than men!” (Acts 5:29).

Paul is admonishing the Ephesians: “You must obey God rather than the rulers of this age, both earthly and spiritual!” (cf 6:10–18). “You must live as children of light, rather than of darkness!” In fact, Paul’s argument is similar to his argument to the Corinthian believers: “Be who you are.” Christians are now a “new creation” (1 Cor 5:17) and are “being transformed into God’s image with ever–increasing glory” (2 Cor 3:18). They were former idolaters, adulterers, thieves, greedy, drunkards, slanderers, and swindlers; but they “were washed, sanctified, and justified in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God” (1 Cor 6:11). They were once in darkness, but they are in the light. If, in the past, they were not merely in darkness but were darkness, so that their entire existence was defined by it, they are now redeemed and are light (Eph 5:8). Paul was basically reminding them of their conversion, and the transformation that they had experienced in Christ: “As for you, you were dead in your transgressions and sins… But because of his great love for us, God, who is rich in mercy, made us alive with Christ even when we were dead in transgressions” (2:1, 4–5).

The contrast between light and dark as metaphor of conversion is characteristic of Christian literature (2 Cor 4:6; Col 1:13; 1 Pet 2:9). In Ephesians, nonbelievers are described as “darkened in understanding” (4:18), whose activities are the “unfruitful works of darkness” (5:11), and whose world is “this darkness” (6:12; cf Luke 22:53; John 3:19). So now, Paul is saying that they have been freed from such an existence. But being freed from light also entails living as children of light. Hence, Paul uses the darkness-light metaphor for Christian ethical instruction. Themes such as “putting off” certain behaviors and “putting on” other attributes (Eph 4:22–24) naturally interrelate with it. Paul stressed that children of the light should walk in a way appropriate to the nature of their existence. They are not to do the “works of the flesh” (Gal 5:19–21), but should have the “fruit of the Spirit” (Gal 5:22023) and the “fruit of righteousness” (Phil 1:11; Rom 6:21–22; Rom 7:4; Col 1:6, 10). In Ephesians, he enumerates the “fruit of the light” as “goodness, righteousness, and truth” (5:9). They are not to participate in the “unfruitful works of darkness” (5:11) such as greed and sexual immorality (5:3–6). But Paul is also clear that it is not enough to avoid the works of the darkness (5:3–7). Rather, it is important to be positively transformed (5:8–14). This is what it means to awaken.

Because we are the children of light, we must remain vigilant. This seems to be one the messages of 1 Thessalonians 5:4–8: “But you, brothers and sisters, are not in darkness so that this day should surprise you like a thief. You are all children of the light and children of the day. We do not belong to the night or to the darkness. So then, let us not be like others, who are asleep, but let us be awake and sober. For those who sleep, sleep at night, and those who get drunk, get drunk at night. But since we belong to the day, let us be sober, putting on faith and love as a breastplate, and the hope of salvation as a helmet.” Verse 8 resonates very well with Ephesians 6:10–18, where constant vigilance and readiness against the forces of darkness is admonished. Instead of sleeping, which is unproductive (cf Eph 5:11), we must “wake up” (5:14) and be on our guard. The same themes can be found in Romans 13:11–14: “The hour has already come for you to wake up from your slumber, because our salvation is nearer now than when we first believed. The night is nearly over; the day is almost here. So let us put aside the deeds of darkness and put on the armor of light. Let us behave decently, as in the daytime, not in carousing and drunkenness, not in sexual immorality and debauchery, not in dissension and jealousy. Rather, clothe yourselves with the Lord Jesus Christ, and do not think about how to gratify the desires of the flesh.”

A large portion of Paul’s letter to the Ephesians (chapters 4 and 5) are about ethical and moral lifestyle, and like the Ephesians, we are perhaps already tired of hearing sermons about such things. Why should Christians be taught about such basic and elementary teachings? It is fascinating to remember that Paul was writing his letter to Christians. This means that it is Christians who should read and listen to his admonitions. It is Christians who must do all these things. He was very concerned that Christians should live according to our purpose and being as followers of Christ: “For we are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works, which God prepared in advance for us to do” (Eph 2:10).


MISSIONAL IMPLICATIONS

Living as children of light has two purposes, according to Paul: (1) for the sake of God, and (2) for the sake of our neighbors. But it appears that Ephesians 5 is more concerned about the centrality of our Christian lives as witnesses of the gospel to our unbelieving neighbors. The purpose of awakening from our moral slumber and ignorance is not so that we gain blessings or gifts from God. Awakening is not an end in itlself and for our sakes; it is for the sake of others. If we awaken from our moral slumber, and exist as children of light, the result is that “Christ will shine on us” (Eph 5:14).[1] Hence, moral awakening has missional implications. Such an argument is found throughout the Scriptures.

There is a relationship between our being transformed, living our transformed lives, and being a testimony to God’s name. This is not rocket science or even a difficult logic to understand. Quite simply, if “we are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works” (Eph 2:10), and yet we live our lives not in accordance to our transformed being, then we do not become good testimonies about ourselves and about the God who transforms us. If this happens, we profane God’s name (Exo 20:7; Lev 18:21; 19:12; 20:1-5; 22:32; Prov 30:9; Isa 52:5-6; Jer 34:16; Ezek 13:19; 20:9, 14, 22, 27, 39; 22:16; 29:14; 36:20; Amos 2:7; Mal 1:12). The relationship between God’s holy name and mission is clear in Ezekiel 39:7: “I will make known my holy name among my people Israel. I will no longer let my holy name be profaned, and the nations will know that I the Lord am the Holy One in Israel.” It is either we profane God’s name through our actions and cause people to ridicule our God, or we live our lives as transformed men and women, and thus make the nations know God’s holy and saving name. The world’s spotlight is focused on us, watching our lives, scrutinizing our intentions, and looking for signs of inconsistensies. Whether we like it or now, we live in a cynical world where people delight in talking about the evils of others. And is it not that Christianity has dimmed its light and made its salt bland by the broadcasted sins committed by Christians, particular religious leaders? It is when our testimony is damaged that the Name of our Holy God is tainted.

The first petition of the prayer Jesus taught his disciple reveals something important to us. Jesus asked us to pray “Our Father in heaven, hallowed be your name” (Matt 6:9). In more contemporary language, it means “sanctify your name” or “make your name holy.” What does it mean for the name of YHWH to be sanctified or made holy? He is not unholy that he needs to experience sanctification. He is already holy; He cannot be holier. In the first place, it can mean: “may the world recognize the holiness of God.” This seems to be what Isaiah 29:23 is talking about:

“When they see among them their children,
    the work of my hands,
they will keep my name holy;
    they will acknowledge the holiness of the Holy One of Jacob,
    and will stand in awe of the God of Israel”

This means that by God’s own work, people will know him: “And so I will show my greatness and my holiness, and I will make myself known in the sight of many nations. Then they will know that I am the Lord” (Ezek 38:23). Secondly, it can mean: “may we sanctify your name.” This makes strong sense in Jewish mentality, because hallowing God’s name is “the most characteristic feature of Jewish ethics.”[2] In fact, one of the unspoken rules of Jewish life is that one must never profane the Lord’s name before Gentiles. The responsibility falls on us. The early fathers Cyprian and Chrysostom made this important point.[3] By our lives, our dealing with others, our decision-making, our actions, our words, our dispositions, our lifestyles, and everything that we do, may we sanctify the name of our Lord. The prayer, thus, is “May we live our lives blamelessly so that your name is sanctified, glorified, and made known to all.” This is the essence of the command of Jesus in Matthew 5:16: “Let your light shine before others, that they may see your good deeds and glorify your Father in heaven.” By being who we are as sanctified believers, we also sanctify the Lord’s name and witness to his holiness. It is by hallowing God’s name that God’s “kingdom [will] come on earth as it is in heaven” (Matt 6:10).

The prophet Isaiah paints a wonderful picture that we must all aspire.

“Arise, shine, for your light has come,
    and the glory of the Lord rises upon you.
See, darkness covers the earth
    and thick darkness is over the peoples,
but the Lord rises upon you
    and his glory appears over you.
Nations will come to your light,
    and kings to the brightness of your dawn” (Isa 60:1-3; cf 2 Cor 3:18)

“Thick darkness is over the people,” says Isaiah, but we must not worry. Instead, we must “arise, shine, for your light has come, and the glory of the Lord rises upon you… The Lord rises upon you and his glory appears over you.” Because of this, “nations will come to your light, and kings to the brightness of your dawn.” We are the light of the word, Jesus said (Matt 5:14), and if we allow our light to shine, peoples and nations will know God.
  

CONCLUSIONS

In John 1:43-46, Nathanael asked the question, “Can anything good come from Nazareth?” Nathanael was skeptical about whether Philip’s recommendation about Jesus Christ is trustworthy. Philip did not respond to the question in a philosophical or intellectual manner. He did not even try to convince his friend with an argument. Instead, he simply said “Come and see!” He invited Nathanael to see for himself, to experience for himself why Philip is so convinced that he has found the one spoken of by the prophets.[4] “Come and see” – this is great a summary of how being and evangelism are one. It is not “come and listen” or “come and have fun” or “come and be free from your ignorance.” Rather, it is witness by being who we are, so that people will know the Lord who saves. The Gospel is as simple as this.


PRAYER (Eph 3:14–21)
Father, 15 from whom every family in heaven and on earth derives its name, 16 we pray that out of Your glorious riches You may strengthen us with power through Your Spirit in our inner being, 17 so that Christ may dwell in our hearts through faith. We pray that we, being rooted and established in love, 18 may have power, together with all the Lord’s holy people, to grasp how wide and long and high and deep is the love of Christ, 19 and to know this love that surpasses knowledge—that we may be filled to the measure of all the fullness of God.

20 To You who are able to do immeasurably more than all we ask or imagine, according to Your power that is at work within us, 21 to You be glory in the church and in Christ Jesus throughout all generations, for ever and ever! Amen.


[This sermon was preached at Central Church of the Nazarene's 37th Anniversary celebration on October 27, 2013]. 


[1] Light also and must expose sin, according to Paul (Eph 5:11), and it has the positive result of conversion (1 Cor 14:24–25).
[2] Craig S. Keener, A Commentary on the Gospel of Matthew (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1999), 219.
[3] Ancient Christian Commentary on Scripture: Matthew 1-13 (ed. Manlio Simonetti; Downers Grove, Ill.: IVP, 2001), 132-133.
[4] Leon Morris, The Gospel According to John (rev. ed.; Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1995), 145.

Easter: Peace and Forgiveness

Christ is risen! We are celebrating this. So in our gatherings there is a lot of great music, there is a celebratory spirit, there is a lo...